GOVERNMENT TAKEOVERS AND TEXAS

While the eyes of the nation are focused upon the rural Nevada town of Bunkerville and the Bundy Ranch, another significant land grab is underway in the other half of the country. While less physically confrontational at present, government oppression is none the less at the root of a dispute on the border between Oklahoma and Texas. It’s an on-going process, following the migration of the Red River, which the feds define differently dependent upon their their “needs.”

Tommy Henderson lost a lawsuit thirty years ago and with it 140 acres of his ranchland. The BLM victory resulted in the Oklahoma/Texas border being redrawn a mile to the south of where it had previously been.

Henderson received nothing in exchange for his land. Not one cent, and the BLM is back for more. This time they’ve got their eyes on roughly 90,000 acres. And they are employing similar tactics to what won for them in the eighties.

BLM seeks to use the previous lawsuit as precedent in their attempt to steal land along a 116 mile stretch of the Red River. The natural migration of the Red River is at the heart of the dispute and the opportunity being seized upon by the Feds.

BLM is making a claim that the land never belonged to Texas, which the landowners vehemently dispute.

www.thelibertycourier.com

STREUSAND THEN AND NOW

Like our current President, if you go back twenty years ago in Ben Streusand’s life you would never think there would be any possibility of a rise in political leadership. But Streusand has hidden backers lurking in the shadows that continue to fund bids on Streusand’s behalf as he continues to wait for new election cycles to run in open seats in different districts in Texas. This desperation for a seat, any seat, leads many to wonder who is buying this seat for him.

If you flash back twenty years ago and court records, Streusand appears to be a serial adulterer that is set to go through a nasty divorce. He also is playing on the opposite political team he is today. He is donating big bucks and buddying up to Democrats back in that day. In the 1980’s and 1990’s he is failing to pay his taxes, but since then he has not failed to pay megabucks to computer spinmeisters to bury deep in Google.

But the tide turned against Democrats in Texas and Streusand decided to change colors. He made millions as a mortgage banker during an opportunity in that industry that true conservatives say never should have happened. Streusand doesn’t blink an eye however; he just acts like his knowledge of that industry will be an advantage……. The problem is “the advantage” may be for those in the shadows rather than for voters in southeast Texas.
 

Streusand tried to erase his past with his wife and with Democrats. The couple reconciled (he must be one heckuva an apologizer when he finally comes clean!). He even became the head of large and effective Republican group. He also became a regular on talk radio. But like Obama, he has never held elective office. He is best known for talking. He is a rich man that has richer men backing him. He buys election help and has a record for attacking the grassroots’ choice. He uses his Houston connections to make him appear to be the Tea Party choice……. Insiders’ money to appeal to people who consider themselves outsiders.
 

Streusand, like Obama, in many ways has really not changed from then to now. Streusand is still looking out for Streusand. He does what he has to do to make money and he will do what he has to do to win a seat in the House. His high pitched, effeminate voice knows the right buttons to push on the radio. His imagemakers have had to work on what he says on the campaign trail. They want him to tone down his arrogance and attack his opponent. But like Obama, he just can’t stop it. No more than he can stop that slight tilt he has when he thinks he is being brilliant – his nose tilted upwards, and his arrogance filling the air.

Why is some of this relevant? It shouldn't be. It wouldn't be. His opponent primary races against  Republicans with class and the races have all been repsectful.   But his opponent also has had years of going into counties where evry official was a democrat and laying out the case for conservative leadership/ Streusand's imagemakers have lied and acted like he has been at this for years and he has had to go in other becuase nobody there has his years of experince. The fact is Dr. Babin blazed the trail in this area for Republicans by his articulate tough face to face debate with Democrats when Streusand was on their side. Streusand came along when it was popular and debated on the radio. he claims he is the man that has been in the arena. If Dr. Babin won't brag on himself and he won't point out how deceptive this man is, we will. 

Voters found out just in time to spank Streusand at the polls in district 10 and we need to spread the word now. We don't need imagemakers electing any more community organizers and rich mortgage bankers……. ELECTION DAY MAY 27

www.thelibertycourier.com

BEN STREUSAND GREED- Who should get the blame for subprime fiasco?

STREUSAND: FOR THE LOVE OF MONEY

At a time when millions of Americans have lost their homes, and millions more are upside down, and may yet lose their homes, and with several thousand of these people in Texas’s 36th Congressional District, Why is it that Ben Streusand feels that he deserves a seat in Congress after profiting from the mortgage collapse? Seems to me like he ought to be doing another kind of serving time.

Be aware of who you vote for, there are issues at stake that we cannot afford to risk on someone with Ben Streusand’s troubled past.

Go to www.thelibertycourier.com and learn more.
Look at "STREUSAND SHOWS HIS OBNOXIOUS ARROGANT SIDE"
on www.thelibertycourier.com
 

Pinochio Pretends to be Reagan

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=klpNVt75VKI

 

When Ben Streusand’s Clinton-like “research team” left Brian Babin’s hometown after spending two weeks looking for anything they could find to demonize their opponent, voters will be pleased to know they found NOTHING. Notice I said pleased. Not surprised. Babin has been one of the most popular conservative candidate’s ever to put his name on a ballot in East Texas. Voters know him and like him and trust him.

 

The facts did not deter Streusand’s decision to sling mud and try to overcome the fact he did not actually live in this district,  Taxes were raised thirty years ago and Babin was on the board that voted unanimously to raise them. Streusand knew the rest of the story because his team knew it. But he left out that everyone in Woodville’s position raised taxes to adjust to the mandates in the Robin Hood plan the Supreme Court of Texas had upheld.

 

Streusand blindsides Babin with this and filmed his response to a vote that was cast three decades ago. He thinks this makes Babin look bad. Well I hope voters don’t send this kind of person to Washington D.C. thinking this kind of tactics will work up there. Streusand will be ripped to shreads if he tries this amateur debate stuff in Congress. Just like in this case, someone will look back and see what actually happened. Channel 12 did. Babin was a tax cutter and acted and voted like all conservatives did in Texas with the circumstances of that time.

 

Streusand says he would have done differently. But had he decided to vote as he said and had he influenced enough others to do the same …… there is no question it would have cost Woodville taxpayers hundreds of thousands of dollars. The highest court in the land had already ruled on Robin Hood.

 

It is highly unlikely Streusand would have voted as he says he would have however. Records reveal a younger Streusand had other similarities with Clinton (besides his opposition research/hit team). Besides working as a staffer for Democrats, court records from a filing for a divorce indicate he may have had Monica-like problems.

 

So in the midst of his Democrat brethren and a swinging life style, Ben Streusand would have taken on this expensive issue? No. He would not have been elected and he never has been elected to represent conservatives anywhere at anytime. Ben Streusand was fortunate to patch up a marriage he all but destroyed and he was out seeking his fortune. A fortune he would accumulate through taking advantage of Dodd-Frank and what has become known as the home loan debacle. He has no record in office and the record he does have is one that most people would not put out there in front of their neighbors.

 

The last district Streusand tried to purchase his congressional seat in rejected him 2 to 1 on election day. If people that know his history don’t vote this time, we will have someone in Washington who will be working for himself – not us. Please vote May 27^th.

Richard Pegues James Richard Pegues

 

 

 

 

 

A DESPERATE STREUSAND JOINS DEMOCRAT IRS LOIS LERNER

It is a political year and though the public has grown weary of it, the public is also use to wild-eyed crazy attacks during this time. But who would have ever guessed Ben Streusand, the second place finisher in the race for congressional district 36 , would be desperate enough to use one of Lois Lerner’s “investigations to attack a Republican?

Ben Streusand was set to only have one big mark against him when he signed up to run for the congressional race in district 36, but he felt confident he could use his contacts in Houston to make himself look like a candidate widely supported in a district that he does not live in. He felt confident people in Harris county would not care where a candidate lived.

Whether that is true or not, Streusand was not aware that someone who was more experienced with conservative credentials that lived in the district would sign up to run in the last days before the deadline.

Streusand immediately turned to consultants and a fat wallet to start shooting down Dr. Brian Babin when he saw he no longer was the favored candidate by voters. His researchers took votes having to do with local government and told the voters to beware of Babin he was a big government politician. But when he discovered voters knew Dr. Babin and they did not fall for Streusand’s political tricks, the Streusand people decided to risk using information they should have never mentioned.

Streusand’s people are warning the public about Babin’s problem with his last campaign and an investigation that ended with a heavy fine. Two huge problems with this distortion of truth, The first problem is Babin was not found guilty. But the second problem is huge for Streusand and it is likely why he has not instructed his people to push this distortion too hard until just before the election.

The problem is that voters will find out LOIS LERNER was the person in charge of the so called “investigation.”: Lois Lerner is the IRS witch who has been hunting down conservatives and using her office to throw mud on conservatives for years. Recent news reports indicate she will be found in contempt of Congress and possibly face criminal charges for some of her most recent activities.

Why has Ben Streusand joined the democrats is a question easy to answer. Ben Streusand wants to be a representative in Congress and nothing ……. I mean nothing, including where he lives or the truth about honorable conservative patriots will stop him. Only the voters can stop Ben Streusand.

STREUSAND IN ATTACK MODE

 

1. In his first race (in a different district) Ben Streusand, of Houston, gave his campaign $3.25 million. His spending per vote cast in one race was $500 if. It was the most money spent by any one individual running for Congress that year.  It was Obamaesque.
 

2. Since both, Streusand and his opponent, now Congressman McCaul of district 10, promised t bedrock Rhe voters Republican values, promising to defend the nation's borders, get government out of the way of business, cut federal spending and work to ban abortion - Streusand went very negative to try and smear McCaul. HIn the end voters didn't trust Streusand and he was beat nearly 2 to 1 because voters rejected his smear tactics and t.hey smelled his distortions. He had not paid his own taxes in the 80's and 90's but he wanted to speak as an expert on taxes. He wanted to question his opponent trustworthiness when questions about his educational background and his claims of being a vet lingered in the air.

3. McCaul blamed Streusand for a campaign that has "spiraled into one of the most negative, nasty campaigns the state of Texas has ever seen. The truth will prevail at the end of the day," McCaul said. "Good will prevail over evil, and it's time for this negative campaign to stop."

4. McCaul has been forced to spend much of his time and some of his money responding and reminding GOP voters that Streusand, who has given more than $500,000 to Republican candidates and causes, made contributions to two Democrats, former U.S. Rep. Ken Bentsen and former U.S. Sen. Bob Krueger.

5. Streusand's commercials note that McCaul worked in the Justice Department under President Clinton. The spot does not mention that McCaul was a nonpolitical appointee who began at the agency when the first President Bush, who is endorsing him, was in office.

6. Streusand is doing the same type thing to the highly revered and honorable Dr. Brian Babin.
He has spent millions hiding his past and he has never held elective office. His experts have spent hours rigging the internet to spit out what they want voters to think about Streusand and about Obama. Hpeople to figure any angle they can to make conservatives reject his opponents and choose him. He has had unflattering stories buried on google and he has enhanced the few  good stories. He has used a small full of powerful people to squelch aid to Babin while, if need be, he has twisted arms to make himself look like he has broad grassroots support.

---

STREUSAND CAMPAIGN DISTORTING THE TRUTH TO OVERCOME HIS RESIDENCY PROBLEM

Ben Streusand does not live in congressional district 36 and he has said he is running in that district because there is no one there capable of doing the job. He also said he did not know any of the eleven other candidates that signed up to run in the Republican primary. When voters connected the dots and wondered aloud how he could say such a thing if he did not know his opponents or many people in the district, Streusand set himself up to either bow out of a race or have an all out character attack against whoever made a run-off (if he was in a run-off with someone). 

When Dr. Brian Babin threw his hat in the ring there was very little doubt who would win 8 of the 9 counties in the district. With his name ID still registering from campaigns in the past when he debated conservative values and philosophy with the ruling Democrats, Babin doubled Streusand’s vote totals. But with twelve candidates in the race, Babin did not get enough votes to avoid a run off.

Without hesitation, Streusand sent staff to Babin’s hometown to try and get an angle so he could attack Babin and overcome his own residency problem. Streusand has never held elective office so just like our current President, he decided his lack of experience left him beyond criticism and in a position in his mind to attack without repercussion.

Several areas of attack have already surfaced as Streusand’s political team is calling people and push polling. Push polling is a method that usually uses a boiler room type set up of paid callers that pretend they are taking a poll on a political race. The “push” part comes in when the pollster starts to give “information” to the voter that would tend to make most people vote for their candidate.

Streusand’s people have touted some of their endorsements in their push polling and of course left out that Babin has just as many or more conservative endorsements. They have also distorted Babin voting record. They are attempting to discredit Babin and in doing so they think the voter will then think Streusand was right, there is no capable candidate here in CD 36. An example of their distortion is leaving out the fact the state had mandate with Robin Hood when Babin was elected to the school board. Streusand tries to trick voters into believing Babin voted for a sizable tax hike for Woodville ISD when he, in fact, knows that was the time of the Robin Hood plan. 

Streusand leaves out a lot of details when he says Babin was a tax and spender as a city councilman. His Clinton-like opposition research had to go back thirty years to city council records to argue this.  While it is true a much younger Brian Babin in his first few days as a councilman voted to fund sewage hookups for people finished with their construction. The maxed out sewage system was paid for by a one cent raise in taxes. But what Streusand leaves out is that no one voted against allowing people to have commodes to flush and water for their bath tubs and washing machines. Streusand leaves out the fact Babin did what voters wanted him to do and he won elections easily. Streusand fails to point out these decisions were without objection.

Not having ever been elected, Streusand is attacking a candidate in every way he can and he is using his connections in Harris County to twist some arms and use sources outside the district to influence endorsements inside the district. While it is true politics is not a place for sissies to tread. It is also true elective offices that are filled with people who have no experience and reinvent their opponent to look like something they aren’t often end up with Obama like results. People who talk us to death while their nose is pointed slightly toward the clouds as they sit in seat they feel they deserve because of who they are and who they know. Streusand may can bury Babin by using money to phone us to death and fill our mailboxes to capacity and even interrupt our favorite t.v. show, but those who know Babin know he is the kind of person who could run and win in any district.  

But he is also the kind of person that has enough integrity to only place his name on a ballot where he lives, regardless of loopholes in election law.

HITLER A BIGGER IGNORAMUS THAN WE ALREADY THOUGHT

Present day evidence seems to indicate Adolf Hitler "unwittingly" married a Jewish woman when he wed his mistress, Eva Braun, hours before committing suicide in 1945.  Hitler is responsible for the death of over six million Jews and for spreading hatred and violent prejudice against the race of people that Jesus Christ came from.

Braun is the focus of  Great Britain's Channel 4 documentary titled "Dead Famous DNA," in which DNA from the relics of famous historical figures is extracted and analyzed to help solve mysteries associated with them. A DNA analysis was conducted on hair samples from a brush monogrammed "E.B." that was found at the end of World War II at Hitler's Alpine residence by an American intelligence officer. The brush allegedly belonged to Braun and DNA analysis purportedly showed it "contained the hair of someone who could have had Jewish ancestry," specifically Ashkenazi Jew ancestry, according to Channel 4.

We can not say, but Hitler may have received news of this revelation upon his arrival in Hell and perhaps it adds to his daily torment. All those people who are misguided enough to emulate Hitler, and believe it or not there are some, should learn from one more example of his pitiful life.