BEN STREUSAND GREED
In a shocking introduction to at least 8 out of the 9 counties in congressional district 36, Be n Streusand, the candidate who placed a distant second in the primary, has repeatedly insulted the entire district. All we can assume is Streusand is using attention getting techniques he has learned in his time on the radio to get name recognition, since he has refused to change his inflammatory rhetoric toward the voters.
The “technique” that
gained him 16% of the votes in the 2014 Republican primary is to insult the
voters that live in the district and possibly appeal to Democrats who have
flocked to vote in the Republican primary in rural counties and perhaps to use a
different method
in Harris County. The candidate
who had twice as many votes as Streusand in the district clobbered him by even
more in 8 out of 9 counties. Since his opponent is so popular in these counties,
it is thought Streusand is trying to appeal to all of the democrats who are
voting in the Republican primary so they can have a say in contested races.
Streusand seems to assume they will try and defeat the largest vote getter of
the Republican primary so the democrat will have more of a chance in the general
election.
What has Streusand said in rural counties
that is so insulting it has gained a great deal of attention by those who
normally pay little attention to election time rhetoric? In at least thirty
different events where Streusand has spoken in a rural county he has explained
to voters that the reason he is running is “there is no one in this district that is
capable of doing what needs to be done”.
Of course, that
comment is an insult to everyone who will be voting in the district, but it did
not stop 2 out of his 11 opponents in the primary from endorsing him. 8 of the
other 9 have endorsed Briabn Babin and one has not endorsed. The two who have
endorsed the man that has told us all that no one was capable in the district of
doing the job evidently have made Streusand’s extensive payroll or they
regretted thinking they were good enough to run for congress.
Another version of
Streusand’s insult to the district voters is that “No
one living in this district has the intestinal fortitude to do what it will take
in Washington”. No one here knows for sure whether
Streusand used this technique when he ran in his own district and voters
rejected him despite him spending millions of dollars in a losing effort. It is
believed he has a different less insulting message for voters
in Harris County and that they will
never hear what he has said over and over again in the rural counties. Though we
disagree with his strategy if he thinks the tremendous increase in democrats
voting in rural county primaries will yield an effort to defeat who they think
is the most difficult candidate for Democrats to beat (Brian Babin, the
overwhelming winner in the primary), it is an unusual tactic.
When a top Streusand
staffer was confronted about the insults, he eventually responded that he has
tried for weeks to get his candidate to drop that kind of language. “He just
won’t listen”. That description of Streusand from his own team makes me think he
may not listen to us voters either.
I guess it is live by
the sword die by the sword. Streusand has never held elective office and touts
his experience in debating a radio audience as his example of unyielding courage
that is needed in Washington. The difference may be
the voters do not go away when the next caller calls in and a congressman does
not have an “on” and “off” switch. In fact, this kind of shocking statement may
be good for radio ratings but we seriously doubt the people in
the Harris County portion of this
district are as impressed with Ben Streusand as Streusand says they
are.
Or perhaps the fact that his opponent in this primary enetered at the last moment and Streusand did not change planned speeches after a more experienced candidate joined the race.
Check out the following youtube videos and listen to a resident of CD 36. And next time you see Ben Streusand tell him he is wrong about where we live. the people in CD 36 are hard working Texans and we have more than enough good candidates than to have to import a slick talking mortgage banker from that brags that he has always lived in the big city.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxnxAaQmu1I
Or perhaps the fact that his opponent in this primary enetered at the last moment and Streusand did not change planned speeches after a more experienced candidate joined the race.
Check out the following youtube videos and listen to a resident of CD 36. And next time you see Ben Streusand tell him he is wrong about where we live. the people in CD 36 are hard working Texans and we have more than enough good candidates than to have to import a slick talking mortgage banker from that brags that he has always lived in the big city.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XxnxAaQmu1I
At least Hillary moved to New York BEFORE
she ran for Congress and she had not lost elsewhere like Streusand did in CD 10.
CD 36 is a district full of strong Texans. we do not need to import candidates.
As the primary results indicated, Streusand is not the strongest candidate in
this field any more than he was in CD 10 when he ran there 2 years
ago.
RICHARD PEGUES
2 comments:
From his very light voice to his bragging about what a great radio guest he is, this is one strange bird. He ain't no Ted Cruz kind of strange either. He is not just self confident, he is full of himself. I talked to his political managers and they admit they are working with him to tone some of this down.
I'm sure his arrogant attitude can't be hidden. As for his people coaching him, bring out the clowns...
Tell me it isn't show.
Post a Comment